Glonce

China's actors and livestreamers are losing work to AI video

miscThe Glonce editorsThe Decoder🔥77Glonce rating77Impact72Novelty68Relevance98Surprise63Players77Credibility82
China's actors and livestreamers are losing work to AI video

AI-generated video is already displacing human actors, influencers, and livestreamers across China's entertainment industry, with some productions already replacing human performers outright. The shift traces to the launch of ByteDance's Seedance 2.0, after which AI-made, "digital" performers could produce videos faster and more cheaply than human ones, and to a higher standard, according to the report.

The scale shows up in China's short-drama market. In the first quarter of 2026, about 128,000 short dramas were published in the country, three times the total output for all of 2025, and 95% of them were AI-generated, according to the China Netcasting Services Association. China's short-drama and livestreaming industry employs 690,000 people directly, and 15 million people list livestreaming as their primary job; the report does not say how many of them have actually lost work to AI so far, only that AI-made video is now cheaper and faster to produce than the human-performed kind.

The cost collapse is stark. One minute of AI-generated video now costs just $90 to $120, about a tenth of what producing the same minute with human actors used to cost, Tsinghua University professor Shen Yang told the Financial Times.

Individual performers are already feeling the effects. Some are reportedly being made to "distil" their voice and likeness into AI tools before being let go, and lawyers say AI-related labor disputes have risen over the past two to three years, though the report gives no count, outcomes, or jurisdiction for those disputes.

The underlying video-generation technology keeps improving: quality has jumped again with the newer Seedance 2.5 and Wan 3.0 models. One example, shared via Hubei Daily, illustrates the kind of AI-generated video already circulating, and the report notes that more realistic examples exist as well.

Key facts

  • In Q1 2026, China published about 128,000 short dramas, three times the total for all of 2025, and 95% were AI-generated, per the China Netcasting Services Association.
  • One minute of AI-generated video now costs $90 to $120, about a tenth of what producing it with human actors used to cost, according to Tsinghua University professor Shen Yang.
  • The shift traces to ByteDance's Seedance 2.0, and AI video quality has since jumped further with Seedance 2.5 and Wan 3.0.
  • China's short-drama and livestreaming industry employs 690,000 people directly, and 15 million people list livestreaming as their primary job.
  • Some performers are reportedly being made to "distil" their voice and likeness into AI tools before being let go, and lawyers say AI-related labor disputes have risen over the past two to three years.

Why it matters

This is one of the more concrete, numbers-backed accounts of generative AI actually displacing a national entertainment workforce, rather than merely threatening to. China's short-drama industry did not just adopt AI tools: in the first quarter of 2026, AI-generated dramas already made up 95% of new output, at roughly a tenth of the previous production cost. The pace of improvement compounds the effect: AI video quality has already advanced further, with Seedance 2.5 and Wan 3.0, since ByteDance's Seedance 2.0 first triggered the shift, so the cost and speed advantage over human performers is still widening rather than leveling off.

Who it affects

Directly: actors, influencers, and livestreamers working in China's short-drama and livestreaming industry, which employs 690,000 people, and 15 million people list livestreaming as their primary job. The report does not say how many of them have lost work so far, only that AI production is now cheaper and faster than hiring them. Some performers are reportedly being forced to "distil" their own voice and likeness into AI tools before being let go, and lawyers report a rise in AI-related labor disputes over the past two to three years.

How to use it

For studios and platforms, the economics are now explicit: one minute of AI-generated video costs about $90 to $120, roughly a tenth of what the same minute used to cost with human actors, according to Tsinghua University professor Shen Yang, who gave the figures to the Financial Times. The tools named in the report are ByteDance's Seedance 2.0, which started the shift, and Seedance 2.5 and Wan 3.0, which have since pushed quality further. For performers, the pattern documented here is being forced to hand over a voice-and-likeness "distillation" to an AI tool, in some cases shortly before losing the job to it.

How solid is it

The two headline statistics come from named sources: the 95 percent AI-generated figure is credited to the China Netcasting Services Association, and the cost figures to Tsinghua University professor Shen Yang, speaking to the Financial Times. The workforce figures, 690,000 employed directly and 15 million livestreaming as a primary job, are stated without an inline source, and no date is given for either the Seedance 2.0 launch or the Shen Yang interview. The claim that AI-related labor disputes have risen is attributed only to unnamed lawyers, with no count, outcome, or jurisdiction given.

Risks and caveats

The report does not establish how many of the industry's 690,000 workers or 15 million livestreamers have actually lost income or jobs to AI video, only that AI production is now cheaper and faster; the real scale of displacement so far is not quantified. No developer is named for Wan 3.0, unlike Seedance, which is credited to ByteDance. The account of performers being pressured to "distil" their voice and likeness into AI tools before dismissal, and of rising labor disputes, rests on unspecified numbers and unnamed sources, so the scale of that pattern is not established either.