Fenix Flexin stops denying he used AI on 'Rubberz'

Key facts

• Fenix Flexin told an Instagram commenter he 'never said I didn't use AI' on 'Rubberz,' only that AI 'had nun to do w recording process.'
• The comment contradicts his on air denial last month, when interviewer Kazeem Famuyide asked him directly on Hot 97's Mornings With Mero and he said there's 'no AI on it.'
• Producer Medasin's videos claimed the AI tool Treblo, formerly Sonauto, was used to make the song, and a company's AI detector identified the track as Treblo AI created.
• Fenix and his team had previously posted what they called clips of the recording session, saying two humans made the song in his living room with 'pro tools auto tune and some reverb.'
• His reply cites rapper Tyga, who admitted using AI on his own 80s influenced album $tarface, as a comparison point.

Why it matters

The flip shows how thin the line between denial and admission has gotten as AI made music spreads. Fenix Flexin spent weeks publicly rejecting the idea that 'Rubberz' involved AI, going as far as posting what he called session file clips and insisting the vocals were his own. His new comment does not retract those claims outright; it reframes them, arguing AI was never part of the 'recording process' even if it played some role elsewhere in making the track. That distinction, offered after an AI detector and a producer's videos both pointed to the tool Treblo, suggests an artist adjusting his public stance once denial becomes hard to sustain, rather than issuing a clean correction.

Who it affects

Musicians who use AI production tools and then face scrutiny over whether to disclose it, fans and listeners trying to work out what is genuinely performed, and companies building AI music detectors whose findings are now shaping public arguments between artists, producers and commenters all sit inside this story. Tyga's earlier admission about his album $tarface is cited in the same exchange as a precedent for an artist openly acknowledging AI use.

How to use it

There is no product angle for listeners here. Treblo, the tool alleged to have been used, and the AI detector that flagged 'Rubberz' are both named but not detailed: no pricing, mechanism or maker's name is given in the source. The practical takeaway is narrower: an AI detector already exists that can flag a track as made with a specific tool, and that flag became public evidence in a dispute an artist could not fully deny.

How solid is it

The claim rests on several independent threads: producer Medasin's videos alleging Treblo was used, a company's AI detector identifying the track the same way, and now Fenix's own comment that stops short of a denial. The article does not name the detector's maker or explain how the detector works, and it gives no exact dates for the Hot 97 interview, Medasin's videos, the detector's release or the song's release, only that the interview took place 'last month.' No confirmation from Treblo or Sonauto's makers is quoted.

Risks and caveats

Fenix's reply is worded to avoid a full admission: he says AI was not part of the 'recording process,' which leaves open what role, if any, it played elsewhere in making the song. The source does not say whether Tyga's album used the same tool, Treblo, that was alleged for 'Rubberz,' so the comparison he draws is not confirmed as an apples to apples one. This is a public statement that no longer flatly denies AI involvement, not a confirmed admission of AI authorship.

“never said I didn’t use AI, i said it had nun to do w recording process . I didn’t even know what da app was till we mixed it and erbody started commenting . ain’t nothing wrong w using new technology as a tool keep up w the times or get left behind”

— Fenix Flexin, replying to a comment on Instagram